LImited Edition mens nike air force 1 low size 11Nike Air Jordan Retro 7 VII Hare 304775-125 Size 12 VNDS OGNIKE AIR MAX 95 PREMIUM BAROQUE BROWN & GOLDEN BEIGE sz 8eur 538416-203,NIB MENS SIZE 10 NIKE AIR MAX 95 ESSENTIAL SNEAKERS GREY/RED 749766-025,Air Jordan VI 6 Retro Premium "Motorsports" White/Black, Men's Size 10.5,NIKE AIR FORCE 1 LOW ID CAMO SIZE 12 808791-982,Lebron X Premium Blue Diamond size 12,Nike Sb Stefan Janoki Max Mens Trainers 631303 Sneakers Shoes 444,Nike Air Jordan 23 XXIII Gray and White US Men's Size 13,Nike Jordan 1 Retro High Premium Black Wolf Grey-summit White size 8.5DS Nike Air Force 1 Low By Stephan Maze Georges size 9 100% AUTHENTIC,Nike Kevin Durant Battle Tested QS Limited Edition “The 16 Collection” DS SZ 11,NIKE AIR FOAMPOSITE ONE ROYAL BLUE 2011 MEN SIZE 10.5 314996-500,Nike Jordan Westbrook 0.2, Wheat / Wheat, High Top, 854563 704, Size 10.5,Mens Nike Kyrie 3 III Olympic Sneakers New, Navy Blue / Gold 852395-400 sku AA,BRAND NEW✔Air Max Trainers. TN Khaki ONLY Size & 11 new with box,SZ.15 Nike Air Max 2017 849559-601 NightMaroon/White.GymRed,2001 Retro Nike Air Jordan 3 III Black Cement Size 10 Original Vintage OG,"Beijing Triumvir x Fly" Nike SB Dunk Mid Elite Size 13,Mens Nike Air Penny IV - 864018 001 - Triple Black Blue TrainersNike Sb High Reese Forbes Denim Size 13 New Nib,Nike Free Orbit II SP Mens 12 Nikelab Polka Dot Spike Pack Red White $200 C155,NIKE AIR JORDAN 5 RETRO White University Red Black 136027-104 Mens SZ 17 No Lid,Nike Dunk High 'Deluxe' 312032 001 Size 8,Nike Air Force 1 07 Moon Landing Blue/Red/Moon Particle AQ0556-200 men size 7-13Nike Air Max 90 Essential Mens 537384-425 Obsidian Mars Stone Shoes Size 10,Nike Free Flyknit Mercurial Savage Beauty CR7 New Us_9.5 12 Eur_43 45 46,Air Jordan Zoom Tenacity 88 - CHOOSE SIZE - AV5878-100 Retro 3 Cement True Blue,MENS NIKE FLYKNIT RACER Punch Volt MENS Size 14,New Nike Air Jordan Retro V Dark Stucco Camo

Nike Air Max 604133-096 Plus Men’s Running, Cross Training shoes 604133-096 Max SZ 12 6342de

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”