Nike Air Jordan Retro I 1 High Flyknit Shadow Black Grey White 919704-003,Nike Air Zoom Huarache 2K4 Kobe Men’s Basketball Shoes 308475-102 Size 10 RARE,Nike Air Max 90 Leather Mens 302519-001 Black Running Athletic Shoes Size 9.5NIKE AIR MAX UPTEMPO 311090-005 BLACK PACK BLACK WHITE DS SIZE: 10.5,NIKE ZOOM TRAIN TORANADA MEN SIZE 8.0 NEW RARE AUTHENTIC HYPER TURQUOISE1801 Nike Downshifter 8 Men's Traning Running Shoes 908984-401NIKE AIR MAX 1 ID GREY-BLACK-WHITE-GUM BROWN SZ 15 MESH TOE! [943756-972],Nike Air Huarache "Cool Grey",Nike Aire 1 Máximo Ultra Prm Jcrd Mujer Zapatillas Running 861656 900 Zapatillas,Nike Air Max 1 Ultra Flyknit volt Electric green 843384-701 Sz. 10Nike Kobe XI Alt size 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 13.5 14 grey 880463 079 shroud midNIKE ROSHE LTD NIKE ID PAISLEY LT BRITISH TAN PHOTO SAMPLE MENS 9 GREYNike SF Air Force 1 Mid Desert Moss/Desert Moss 917753-301 Men's SZ 9NIKE Flyknit Trainer Black Anthracite Black AH8396 004 - Men 8 New/NoLidNike Air Pegasus '89 Premium SE Men's Shoes Black/AnthraciteNike Air Max 270 Flyknit Neon Navy Blue Hot Pink White Running Men's AO1023-501Nike Zoom Victory 2 Track & Field Men's Shoes,Nike Air Huarache Run Ultra Ninja Pack Mens 819685-012 Black Red Shoes Size 9.5NIKE AIR JORDAN 1 KO SHADOW GREY BLACK WHITE SZ 11.5 [638471 003],Nike KD V (5) elite ++ PLAYOFFS HOME ++ sz 9 US 42.5 Kobe Lebron,Nike air max 270 men Sz 10 Worn Lightly 4 Times,Nike Zoom Soldier VII 609679-005 Men's Size US 9 / Brand New in Box!!!,Nike Air Huarache Run Ultra Mens 819685-603 Siren Red Running Shoes Size 7.5,NIKE KYRIE 2 ID MUSTARD BLACK MANGO 843253-998 SIZE 14 UNIQUE COLORWAY,Nike Air Max 95 Ultra 857910-301, Cargo Khaki U.K. 13, USA 14,nike mens vintage track ceats size 9,NEW Jordan XXXI 31 Basketball Shoes Black Game Royal 845037 007 Men's Size 10.5Air CB34 OG Size 12$150 Nike Air Python PRM Red Men's Shoes Sz 12 (705066 601),Nike Aix Max 90 Essential 2015 Command Tavas Ultra Sneakers Casual Shoes,


Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”