NEW Men's Adidas Superstar Shoes Color: Silver Size: 8,PRO BOUNCE 2018 - AdidasAdidas PureBoost Xpose Women's Running Shoes (Size 10) Grey / Gold BA8271 BoostADIDAS ORIGINALS WOMEN'S 'CHILE 62 LEOPARD' PURPLE C62 LEO TT TRACK TOP JACKET,adidas Women's Adizero Tempo 9 W,,NEW ADIDAS WOMEN ORIGINALS PHARRELL WILLIAMS TENNIS HU SHOES ASH PEARL,Adidas Brisbane Unisex Watch ADH6162adidas Dame 4 Shoe Men's Basketball - Choose SZ/Color,adidas Originals Men's Seeley Shoes - Choose SZ/color,adidas Men's Adicross V Golf Spikeless Shoe,ADIDAS FLB Woman Running Black Glitter,ADIDAS BRA DON'T REST ALPHASKIN SPORT - FISHING - XS (4060514308326),Adidas Cloudfoam Xpression F99573 Women's Size US 6,adidas Performance BA8563 Womens X 17.2 FG W Soccer Shoe SIZE 8.5CV8515, adidas Pants – J Trf Ft black/white, Kids, 2018, Polycotton,ADIDAS Men's Supernova Sequence Boost 8 Running Shoe Onix Silver Metalic Sz 11.5adidas outdoor Men's CW pathmaker Hiking Boot,adidas Men's Adicross IV Golf Shoe,Adidas Zne Tapp Pant White New With Tag Size Small Women Original Sport Trouser,ADIDAS Black Long Velvet/Mesh Polo Dress XS,Adidas Women Running Shoes Galaxy 4 Training Fashion Fitness New Gym B43837,Adidas Originals Women's Superstar W (BY9175) Athletic Sneakers White Shoes,Adidas Mens Originals Superstar Chinese New Year sz 11 BA7778 W0401,DA8786 Adidas Men LACOMBE SPZL white chalk white met old gold,Adidas Originals Pro Model White/Black S85956 Superstar Stripe Mens Shoes,adidas Men's 'Adipower Boost' Golf ShoeAdidas Originals 3 Stripe Skirt Size M #AY6700adidas Women's Essentials Linear Tights Dark Grey Heather/Real Magenta Large,ADIDAS GREEN FLASHBACK PRIMEKNIT SNEAKER FOR WOMEN SIZE 5,Adidas Unisex Performance Adizero Lj Track Shoe,

adidas adizero - tempo 9 - Red - adizero Womens 810340

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”