Nike Air Jordan Retro 11 Pantone Size 9.5,Nike Woodside OG Sz 10.5 Black Air Max 1 98 90 95 97 93 94 ACG brown le 180 270,nike air force 1 ... Customised New Sz 7,Nike Lebron XI BHM, Limited Edition Size 10.5,Nike Air Jordan 11 Legend Blue White Colombia Columbia XI Retro 378037-117 DSNike Air More Uptempo "2016" Size US 11NiIKE AIR JORDAN 9 RETRO IX "CHARCOAL" DS (302370-005) 2010 RELEASE RARE Sz 12.5,2017 Nike Blazer Mid Supreme Promo Sample Sz. 9 SB NikeLab Blue White PE Off OGNIKE AIR MAX 1 ANIMAL 11 ATMOS 2006 OG QS tier 0 patta 90 beast safari off whiteNIKE AIR JORDAN 1 PINNACLE BAROQUE BROWN-METALLIC GOLD-WHITE SZ 8 (705075-205),Nike Mens Air Jordan 6 Retro Size 16 VI Off White New Maroon 384664-116,AIR JORDAN 11 RETRO XI LOW TD CLEATS SZ 8 CONCORD WHITE BLACK AO1560 123,Nike Air Jordan 6 Retro "Olympics" - Brand New DS - Size 14,Nike Air Jordan 3 Flyknit Black,Nike Air Jordan Retro 3 Black Cement 88 sz US 8 Tinker,Air Jordan XV 15 Low MOC SL OG 2000 WHITE/MIDNIGHT NAVY 136035 141 2018,100% AUTHENTIC Nike OFF-WHITE Virgil Vapormax Part 2 "White" Size 9 OG ALL,Air Jordan 11 Retro Space Jam 2009 Sz8.5,Nike Mens Air Jordan 5 V Retro Red Suede Flight Suit Black 136027-602 Size 9,Supreme x Nike Nike Air Humara Black Size 8 "Brand NEW",nike huarache mowabb acg foams 13 12 penny jordan I xi iii v lebron iv Kobe lot,Nike air max tn quilted bnib! 97 95 1 bw classic rare 93 180 infra 270 87,Nike Lebron XV 15 Cereal "Fruity Pebbles" Multicolor White 897648-901 Size 10,Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG NRG Black Gold Top 3 Size 11.5. 861428-007Nike " The 10 " Air Presto Off White Black / Muslin  sz 11,2013 NIKE AIR JORDAN RETRO 3 III JOKER US 14 BLACK CEMENT GREEN 88 DB,nike offwhite vapormax size 8.5,Kiko Kostadinov ASICS GEL-BURZ 2 CARAMEL from japan (5844Nike Air Jordan Retro 13 He Got Game,NIKE AIR MAX 1 WOVEN SP Sz 9-10.5 WHITE BLACK POMAGRANATE 651321-106,

1997 OG NIKE AIR JORDAN TRAINER RED 1 WHITE BLACK TRUE RED TRAINER WRESTLING 136004-101 10.5 156891

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old
Off-White × Nike Blazer Mid "Grim Reaper" Size 13 ***Pre-Order***,

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”