Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro "Bel-Air",PROMO SAMPLE Dunk High Pro SB Supreme Red White Stars 307385 161 Size 9 Taiwan,DS NIKE AIR YEEZY 2 BLACK SOLAR RED Size US 8 / KANYE WEST YEEZY BOOST,2013 Nike Zoom KOBE VIII 8 VENOMENON IV 4 BLACK PURPLE CHIFFON GLOW BLUE RED 14,BRAND NEW NIKE AIR MAX 1 "MASTER" SZ 7 910772-001DS NIKE 1997 AIR FOAMPOSITE PENNY OG 7 FLIGHTPOSITE PRO MAX 90 1 FORCE FLIGHTNike Air Max 95 Premium QS Gold BulletMens Air Max Sunset black white size 10,2017 Nike Air Jordan 12 XII Retro CNY Size 13. 881427-122 Taxi 3m flu game,Nike Kith x LeBron LIF XV 15 Concrete Mens AO1068-100 Sail Black Shoes Size 10.5,Nike Air Foamposite One Pink Polarized New Dead Stock SZ 10.5 Brand New with box,Nike Dunk Low Pro SB Sz 10.5 White Cement Black Supreme Blazers High Paris C,DS NIKE 1994 VINTAGE OG AIR JORDAN X DARK SHADOW 12 FUTURE STEEL POWDER BLUE,NIKE Air Jordan 18 2018 Retro Sneaker Shoe US 13 white AA2494 106,The 10 Nike Air Presto Off White Authentic,Nike Air Jordan VII 7 Retro Black/Red-Green Marvin The Martian 304775-029 SZ 9.5,Nike Air Jordan Future Premium SZ 10.5 Black 3M Infrared 23 Retro XI 652141-023,Mens Nike Shox R4 Premium Sneakers New, Obsidian Navy Blue / Silver 302534-401,Nike Sb Brut Sz 6.5NEW NIKE AIR MAX 180 COMME DES GARCONS HOMME PLUS CDG PINK/BLACK AO4641 SZ 5.5,Nike kobe 8 "promo sample 1 of 2 pairs" size 9.5NIKE LEBRON X EXT CORK QS - ITEM NUMBER 2-1017,Nike Air Foamposite One Mens 314996-602 Rust Pink Basketball Shoes Size 11.5,Nike Dunk PRM HI UNDFTD SP - 598472 110Mens Nike Air Max Plus BR Sneakers New, Trooper Green 898014-200 SKU AA,Nike MD Runner 2 749794010 black halfshoes,Nike Air Max 98 Gundam OG Rare Wmns Womens 9.5 26.5 AH6799-100 8 7.5 97 95,Nike Air Jordan 11 XI Low Sz 10 DS White Varsity Red Cherry Retro 528895-101,Jordan 1 Retro High Homage To Home (Non-numbered) size 8 US Men Authentic DS,Nike Air Jordan IV Retro 4 x Kaws Black Clear Glow 930155-001 Size 11,


Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”