27cm genuine national Women's Air Jordan 1 Retro High Premium from japan (3003,Nike Air Jordan Retro XI Space Jam 11 Men Size 9.5 Confirmed Monstar Mash,Nike Air Presto Mid SP x Acronym Size 7-11Nike Air Yeezy 1 "Zen" Size US 10NIKE AIR HUARACHE ID WILL PREMIUM LEATHER CEDAR BROWN SZ 11 [918438-991]Nike Men's Air Force 1 Sneakers - Size 10.5 US, White,Nike KD 5 Aunt Pearl, Size 9.5,2018 Nike Zoom Lebron XV 15 KS2A SZ 9 Orange Box James Watch PE AR5125-800,2016 Nike Air Jordan 11 XI Retro Space Jam Size 14 378037-003 bred concordWestbrook Frames CAMO Limited Edition Sneakers Size 10.5 Jordan ONLY 14 Pair MVPNike Air Jordan XI 11 Low OG Black/Dark Grey-True Red 130270-001 SZ 10.5,NEW Nike Air Max 97 Off-White Elemental Rose Serena Williams Size 11 AJ4585-600,Nike Air More Uptempo - 902290 700,2011 Nike Air Jordan 3 III Retro Black Flip Size 11. 315767-001 1 2 4 5,Nike Air More Uptempo Chi Size 7.5. AJ3138-600 Jordan Pippen,Nike Air Jordan 3 Retro Golf Shoe MENS SIZE 11.5 AJ3783-001 Black Green Glow DS,Nike Air Berwuda Prem 844978-700 US 8.5, Waffle Internationalist,Air Jordan 8 retro "Playoff" Size 11.5MNike Kobe 9 IX Elite Gold Fundamentals Size 11. 630847-100 jordan bhm all starAir Jordan 11 Bred “2012” Release DS Size 10.5,AIR JORDAN 13 RETRO "PLAYOFF 2011" 414571-001 Size 10,NIKE AIR JORDAN 3 RETRO III BLACK VARSITY RED CEMENT GREY 2001 136064 001 sz11DS,Nike Blazer SB Supreme Blazer Black Sz 9.5,Nike Air Jordan 5 Retro Low Neymar Size 11.5 Reflect Silver Infrared 846315 025Air Jordan 11 Low Navy/Gum Size 7y,Nike Air Max 90 Ultra Mid Winter ~ Olive Green ~ 924458 300 ~ Size 13,2018 Nike Air Jordan 3 Retro 88 OG Black Cement Sz 12,Nike Zoom Vapor RF X AM 95 Size 11.5 Roger Federer limited Black Volt AO8759 078Nike Zoom Kobe 7 VII System Elite white metellic gold size 10.5Air Jordan 6 Retro Black Infrared Size 11 ds 100% authentic 384664-023 Nike Rec

Nike CUSTOMIZABLE MEN'S Air Force 1 '07 AS QS CUSTOMIZABLE Nike SIZE 10.5 BRAND NEW adba10

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old
NIKE NIKELAB AIR MAX 1 PINNACLE MAX CONTRAST ALL SZ 100% AUTHENTIC 859554-003,

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”