Air Jordan 8 Retro OVO Black Size 11.5 DEADSTOCK 100% AUTHENTIC,NIKE AIR JORDAN6 RETRO Jordan 6 Retro from japan (5453Nike Air Foamposite One "HOH" - 314996 030,2009 Nike Air Jordan Retro XI 11 Black/Varsity Royal-White Space Jam Size 13NIKE AIR JORDAN XI 11 WHITE CONCORD BLACK ICY SOLE ORIGINAL OG BRED DMP 1995 10Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Royal Blue 2017 Size 10.5Nike Air Vapormax Flyknit Moc Mens AH3397-013 Midnight Fog Running Shoes Size 11,NEW IN BOX NIKE AIR MAX 1 PREMIUM RETRO 908366-700 DARK CURRY/Blue/White 10.5Nike Air Jordan II MELO 2 Two Retro OG 2004 NIB DS NEW RARE Doernbecher sz 10.5Air Jordan 1 I Retro High OG Blue Moon 555088-115 US 10-13 Summit White Clay,Nike Air Jordan IV 4 Retro WHITE FIRE RED BLACK CEMENT COOL GREY 308497-110 11.51997 Vintage Nike Air Foamposite Pro Pearl 830027 101 sz 9.5,Nike Air Jordan 12 Retro OVO White Style Size 10.5,NIKE AIR MAX 1/97 'SEAN WOTHERSPOON' - LIGHT BLUE FURY/LEMON WASH - AJ4219-400,Nike Air Jordan 4LAB1 AJ Glow/Reflect Silver-Black-White 677690 355 SIZE 12.5,Nike Air More Uptempo '96 Premium Mens AA4060-200 Flax Gum Suede Shoes Size 9.5,LEBRON JAMES XI PREHEAT SIZE 14 ORANGE SNEAKER SHOES W/ GRAY NIKE SWOOSH & SOLES,Women’s Nike Air Max Plus Slip SP US 5,air jordan 11 like win 82,2004 Nike Air Jordan XII 12 Retro PLAYOFFS DS NEW sz 11 NIB UNC Cherry Taxi FluNike Dunk Low Pro SB - Raygun Home Black - *Size 8.5* - Brand NewAIR MAX 97 PREMIUM JAPAN CAMO 28.5cm from japan (5005,DS 2001 NIKE AIR JORDAN 1 I BRED size 14 BLACK RED,Nike Vapor Max plus betrue VAPOR MAX PLUS from japan (4783NIKE AIR JORDAN 6 RETRO WHITE-VARSITY RED-BLACK SZ 9.5 BULLS! [384664-102],Nike SB Paul Rodriguez X Michael Jordan,Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 Flyknit ~ 875943 600 ~ Size 11.5EXCLUSIVE NIKE VAPORMAX PLUS BLACK TEAM RED HYPER VIOLET Size 11 Women’s,Nike Air Jordan 10 X White Metallic Gold Retro Drake OVO 819955-100Nike Zoom Kobe III 3 FTB 14 Fade To Black Matte Silver Mamba X XI PE Protro IX


Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”