Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro OG High Court Purple GS Sz 5.5AIR JORDAN 4 RETRO LS, Oreo, 11.5, Nike, Jordan BrandNIKE AIR MORE UPTEMPO BLACK REFLECTIVE MENS SIZE 12 DEADSTOCKNIKE air job - Dan 7 retro 304775-142 (3431,Nike Kobe AD Passion, 922482-600, US 8.5, Habanero Red & BlackNIKE Men's Air Vapormax Plus, Black/Black-Dark Grey, 8 M US,2013 Nike Air Jordan 11 XI Retro Reverse Concord Tuxedo Size 11.5. 528895-110. 1,Nike Mens Air Max 1 Master 910772-001,NIKE Air force 1 Lo DJ Premier 28.5 cm new never used,Nike Lebron 5 Hardwood Classic PE Sz 11 Rare Lebron Promo Sample,Nike KD 1 OKC HOME Sz 8Nike Air Jordan Retro 2 DON C JUST DON BLUE 23 SZ 8 SUPER LTD RELEASE 717170 405,NEW Nike Zoom Kobe IX 9 Elite Gumbo All Star Game ASG Maestro 630847-002 sz 9.5Nike Flyknit Trainer Triple Black Mens US 9.5 BRAND NEW,Nike Air Jordan 3 Retro SE Q54 Quai 54 Size 12.5. AT9195-001,Jordan 4 Fear Size 12,2017 Nike Air Jordan 11 XI Retro Low Barons Black White Size 8. 528895-010Nike Air Jordan 3 Retro OG NRG SZ 8 Slam Dunk White Cement Fire Red 923096-101,Nike Air Max 97 OG OFF-WHITE AJ4585 100 Size 9 100% Authentic,AIR JORDAN 10 RETRO NIKE W RECEIPT BULLS OVER BROADWAY & LIBERTY ANNIVERSARY LOT2018 Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Pine Green Sail Black Sz 11 555088-302,Nike Air More Uptempo 96' Triple White size 8.5. Scottie Pippen. 921948-100.,NIKE KOBE VI 6 BARCELONA HOME US 13 MANGO BLUE PRELUDE WHAT THE 8 2 1,Nike SB Janoski Black Mint 12 US,NIKE FREE FLYKNIT MERCURIAL OR NIKELAB OLIVER ROUSTEING SZ 7.5 [834906-007],Nike Air Jordan 3 Free Throw Line White Cement Retro III OG 88 923096-101 Sz 7.5,Nike Vaporfly 4% Flyknit Bright Crimson Ice Blue 7-13 AJ3857-600 100% Authentic,Genuine domestic AIR MAX 270 BETRUE 29cm from japan (3233,NIKE ZOOM KEVIN DURANT KD IV 4 WEATHERMAN LUSH GREEN BLACK ORANGE 473679-303 8,1802 Nike Air Jordan 4 Retro x Levi's Men's Sneakers Sports Shoes AO2571-401

Nike Air Jordan 18 XVIII Retro OG Sport Size Royal Blue White Wizards Size Sport AA2494-106 0617cb

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old
DS STASH NIKE AIR FORCE 1 PREMIUM ZF HIGH HI 9 349384 001 SPNY SF SPECIAL VLONE,

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”