KD 4 Weathermans Size 11 Worn 1x Lightly OG ALL +RECEIPT,NIKE AIR JORDAN SON OF MARS "OLYMPIC RARE" GREY SZ 10.5 [512245-030],NIKE AIR MAX 180 CDG COMME DES GARCONS LASER PINK WHITE AO4641 600 SZ 10 LIMITED,2013 Nike NSW Dunk Free QS Greenwich green 621023 001 - mens US10.5Nike Air Max Zero SE [918232-001] Men Casual Shoes Black/Dark GreyNIKE AIR VAPORMAX MOC 2 ACRONYM LIGHT BONE SIZE 13 Johnny's Passage,NIKE ZOOM KOBE I BLACK MAMBA Size 9.5 BLACK ANTHRACITE 313143-001,AIR JORDAN 1 RETRO HI OG "RE2PECT" 555088-008 black/white 1 Size 12NIKE AIR JORDAN 2 II RETRO QF CANDY PACK DEL SOL BLACK 395709-701 US 8.5 red,Nike Doernbecher Air More Uptempo Sz 9 Ds. Off Bred HomageNike Air Jordan 1 i Dave White US 12.5 Wings for the Future Charity,Jordan 12 Gym Red 2016 Size 13EXCLUSIVE Nike Kobe 1 Undefeated Protro White Black Gum AQ3635-100 SIZE 9.5,Nike SB BHM Dunk Low QS Premium Size 9.5 Black/Purple Venom VNDS Quickstrike,Nike Zoom Kobe III (3) Prelude Size 11,Travis Scott Nike Air Force 1 Low AQ4211-101 Size9.5 US,Nike Air Foamposite One Electrolime Golden State Shoes Size 10.5 - (314996-330)DS Air Jordan 3 III Free Throw Line Size 9.5 w/receipt 923096-101,Nike Dunk High Sole Collector Las Vegas Finale 8.5 3m,Nike Kyrie 4 Cereal BundleDS Nike Zoom Generation Lebron Black, Men size 11.5,Nike Air Vapormax Flyknit Moc 2 AH7006-300 Mica Green Running Shoes Size 15,Nike Kyrie IV 4 Low White Black Gum Bottom Basketball Irving Men's AO8979-100Nike Air Force 1 Mid 07 University Red LN41 99,1985 Original Nike Air Jordan I 1 Red Black White Chicago OG sz 8,2018 NIKE AIR JORDAN RETRO 1 HIGH OG CLAY GREEN/BLACK-WHITE SZ 9.5 DS 555088-135,Nike Air Foamposite One XX “Big Bang” Style AR3771-800 Size 12,DS Nike Lebron X Premium What the MVP Size 8 multicolorNike kobe 7 "BARCELONA BARCA" size 9,Nike Zoom KD III 3 EA SPORTS 417279-400 Blue/Yellow Size 11,

Nike Obsidian Free Mercurial Superfly SP HTM Dark Obsidian Nike 667978-441 (All Size) Flyknit 7e887c

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”