Nike Air Max Plus TN SE 'Mercurial' Obsidian Rare Mens Trainers [AQ1088-400],OG Nike Foamposite Pro Metallic Silver Black sz 11.5 2005,DS RETRO NIKE AIR JORDAN XI 11 SPACE JAM 2009 BLACK ROYAL BLUE 10.5,Air Max 1/97 Sean Wotherspoon,Nike Air Jordan 7 RETRO Size 12 CHAMBRAY 304775-042 BIN MIRO BORDEAUX CNIKE AIR JORDAN 12 RETRO ALTERNATE GYM RED-WHITE-BLACK SZ 15 [130690-600]Nike Air Max 97 Just Do It Mens AT8437-001 Black Orange Running Shoes Size 13NIKE 27 with yellow Glade box (3055,Nike Air Max Zero Essential Black White Size 7.5 876070-004,Air Jordan V WINGS *CONFIRMED BUY* RARE SZ 11.5,2006 Nike Air Jordan VII 7 Retro WHITE BLACK CARDINAL RED BRONZE 304775-101 11.5,2013 NIKE LEBRON X 10 ALL STAR US 13 EXTRATERRESTRIAL ASG AS CORK MVP,Nike NIKE Vapor Max 27.5 from japan (4904,Nike Off White Air Prestos,Nike Air Max 90 Moon Landing Sz 7,Nike Air Jordan 13 XIII Chris Paul Edition CP3 PE size 11,Men's Nike Zoom Vapor RF X Air Jordan 3 Tennis Shoes 709998 106 Sz 9 New,Nike Lebron XI south beachNike Air Jordan 11 XI Retro Low Cherry Varsity Red Size 13. 528895-101 1 2 3 4 5,Nike Air Jordan 3 Retro “Free Throw Line” Style Size 9Nike Sportswear Air Vapormax Flyknit MOC 2 - Black/White/Thunder Grey/Light Cr,NIKE AIR FOAMPOSITE ONE ELECTRO PURPLE-TOTAL ORANGE-BLACK SZ 16 [314996-501],Nike Air Jordan 4 Black Laser 312255 061 DS Rare Air,off white X Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG,MEN'S NIKE AIR MORE UPTEMPO 96 WHITE ROYAL BLUE KNICKS PIPPEN 921948 101 Sz 15,Nike Air More Money Diamond Mens AJ2998-003 Grey Island Green Shoes Size 8.5,Nike KillShot Vintage Japan Exclusive Midnight Navy Size 11 J.Crew Jordan 1 Lot,Nike Air Max 90 Leather “Bright Crimson” Unisex Trainer All SizesNike Air Jordan 5 V Retro OG 845035-003 Black/Fire Red-Metallic Silver-White,Nike Air Jordan Retro 1 High OG Royal Blue Black White SZ 10.5 (555088-007),

Nike Silver Air Foamposite Pro Metallic Silver Nike Surfer 616750-004 Size 9.5 b6a9e4

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”