Air Jordan XI Retro 11 Cap and Gown Prom Night Triple Black 378037-005 Sz 9.5,100% AUTHENTIC NIKE AIR ZOOM SPIRIDON ‘16 OG SIZE 12 VNDS,NIKE LEBRON 9 P.S. ELITE 516958-001 SZ8 SOUTH BEACH PALMER DUNKMAN 112 PREHEAT,Air Jordan Retro 4 Travis Scott Cactus Jack Men Size 12,Nike Lebron 15 Performance x KITH Kings Cloak White Floral Size 11 Worn For 1 Hr,1997 NIKE AIR JORDAN XII OBSIDIAN WHITE FRENCH BLUE 9.5 OG 130690-411-00 VINTAGE,AIR JORDAN II (2) SIZE 10 US AIR JORDAN 2 RETRO QF "2010 RELEASE" 395709 101NIKE AIR PRESTO MID ACRONYM COOL GREY BLACK WHITE AH7832-001 Size 11Nike air max 270 AH8050-002 Mens Sizes 6 - 11 Brand new 2018 colour,RARE BNIB BASKETS MENS NIKE AIR MAX 90 ULTRA 2.0 FLYKNIT CRIMSON OR,Kobe IX High Red Snakeskin Mamba Size 9.5,Nike Foamposite One YEEZY DS Sz12 100% Authentic From FLOCKER W/receiptNike LeBron 15 XV PK80 PE Black Gold Size 12. 897648-795309,Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High OG Wings AA2887-035 Confirmed WITH RECEIPT SIZE 12,Off White x Nike Zoom Fly Size 8,AIR JORDAN 1 RETRO HI THINK 16 aq7476-016 Size 10,Nike Air Jordan Retro 1 High OG Pine Size 11,NEW Men's NIKE AIR JORDAN RETRO 1 Alpha 316269-142 White Blue SZ 10,Nike Dunk High SB QS GS Ugly Christmas Sweater AO1559-446 US 5Y,Jordan Retro 3 White/Cement Sz 8.5,NIKE AIR MAX 1 ANNIVERSARY OG QS WHITE-GAME ROYAL BLUE-GREY SZ 11 [908375-102],NEW AIR JORDAN 11 XI CONCORD 2011 RETRO US 8.5 WHITE BLACK RED 378037 107,2009 Nike Jordan V 5 Bravo Raging Bull DMP RetroNike Air Force 1 Low Ultra Flyknit New England Patriots RKK Robert Kraft Size 9,NIKE AIR MAX 1 KID ROBOT PINK HYPERSTRIKE 10US Sample Albert Heijn,nike air foamposite pro prm yeezy,NIKE LEBRON X 10 MIAMI DOLPHINS ATOMIC TEAL SZ 13.5 [541100-302],Nike NSW AF1 Ultra Flyknit Low [817419-701] Men Casual Shoes Yellow Strike/White,2012 Nike Air Jordan 7 VII Retro Raptor Size 9. 304775-018. 1 2 3 4 5 bordeaux,AIR jordan 12 LOW NIKE from japan (5223,

Nike Jordan Pack 1 Old Love New Love Beginning Moments Pack Jordan Red/Yellow 316132-991 AJ1 f3a911

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”