NEW Nike Air Jordan 11 Retro "Win Like 82" 378037 123 Men's Basketball Shoes,1801 Nike Air Jordan XXXII PF Men's Basketball Shoes AH3348-002,2011 Nike Air Foamposite Royal Blue sz 12,Jordan 1 bred 2013 size 10.5 brand new from Flight Club only worn for fittingNIKE AA3831-100 THE TEN NIKE AIR VAPORMAX FLYKNIT x OFF-WHITE WHITE IN HAND,Nike KD 6 54 Point Game Size 12.5 DS Sample PE What TheDS Nike Air Jordan 1 Retro High DSM US 8.5 789747-401 Blue Patent Leather,Nike Air Max 97 UL '17 Mens 918356-201 Sepia Stone Sand Running Shoes Size 8.5NIke Air Zoom Kobe VI Sz 11 OC Orange County ALL STAR BHM Grinch 448693-800 BNike Lunar Force 1 Flyknit Workboot Black White Oreo UK Size 72018 Air Jordan Retro 1 High OG NRG Gold Toe Black 861428-007 New In Box 2018 DS,Nike MEN'S Air Vapormax Flyknit DB DOERNBECHER SIZE 14 BRAND NEW Max,Nike Lebron 16 “1 Thru 5” (What The 1-5) Size 12 BQ6580-900,NIKE AIR MAX LD-ZERO grey Nike Air Max zero from japan (3236,Nike Lebron 15 XV Prime size 13. Diamond Turf. Deion Sanders. 49ers. AO9144-100.,NIKE AIR JORDAN 1 Pinnacle from japan (5239,NIKE Air Jordan 18 2018 Retro LTD Sneaker Shoes US 7 white AA2494 106,Off-White x air Jordan 1sNike Air Unlimited Men's Black/White/Slate/Ultramarine 89013003,Zoom LeBron III 3 West Coast Size 12 Nike White/White-Gold Dust New With Box,NIKE DUNK HIGH PREMIUM SB HUXTABLE Sz 8-9.5 WHITE BLACK 313171-101,Nike Air More Uptempo White/Gym Red 2016 414962-100 Size 13 Pippen,Air Jordan Retro 3 OG 88s True Blue,Nike Dunk High Premium SB Skunk Size 10 DS Sneakers Todd Bratrud,NIKE AIR JORDAN 6 RETRO VI "PINNACLE" METALLIC GOLD (854271-730) *NEW* Sz,MENS NIKE AIR MAX 95 PREMIUM QS METALLIC GOLD "GOLD MEDAL" SZ 7.5 [918359-700],BRAND NEW NIKE DUNK PREMIUM HI SP ACORN SIZE 12,Supreme Nike SB Gato Black Size 8,1805 Nike Kobe Mamba Rage EP Men's Training Running Shoes 908974-100,Nike x Atmos Air Max 1 Premium QS 'Safari' Flax Kumquat Chestnut 655873-200,


Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old
DS NikeLab x RICCARDO TISCI Air Force 1 HI Sz 10 100% Auth. Nike RT AQ3366 601,

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”