Nike Air Force 1 Supreme Max Air '07 "Dark Army" Size US 11Nike Lebron X 10 Volt Dunkman Size 10 Ds,Nike Lebron James Soldier XI 11 Camo Boys Grade School 918369 200 Nuetral Olive,Nike air max 95 EM running shoes size 8.5 new with box,MENS NIKE FLYKNIT RACER Punch Volt MENS Size 12.5Kevin Durant's Nike Zoom KD IV 4 Year of the Dragon 473679 300 sz 11 Super cleanNike Lebron Soldier 12 XII White/Green/Gold SVSM 2018 All New Mens Basketball,CONVERSE THUNDERBOLT MONO SUEDE LOW TOP MEN'S SHOE - BLACKORIGINAL AIR FORCE 1's '82 ALL ORIGINAL!! NAVY AND LIGHT BLUE! NOT STUFFED!!!!!!,Nike Air Jordan Retro XXXI 31 ASW Chameleon All-Star AS SZ 12 905847-004 1 Vi Xi,Nike Air Jordan Horizon Low,Nike LeBron 14 XIV Black Ice Size 12 852405-002 mvp ghost bhm kith,Nike High Dunk Woven 555030-002 Men Sz 11M High Top Sneakers Black White CheckerNew Nike Metcon 4 AO2806-107 White/Black/Dynamic Yellow | X-fit Games Shoes c1,NIKE KD VII ELITE BASKETBALL SHOES GYM BLUE 724349-404 MENS SIZE 9,Nike Air Max 1 Curry Red Size 13,Nike Zoom Train Command Men's Gym Red/Deep Burgundy/Vast Grey 22478606,Men's NIKE FLYKNIT MAX BLACK-WHITE-BLUE GLOW-BRIGHT MANGO 620469-008 Size 6.5,Men’s Nike Air Force 1 Foamposite Cup “Light Carbon” Size-9.5 Blue (AH6771 002),nike kd 7 global game,Nike Lebron 8 Summit Lake Hornets,NIKE MENS AIR MAX UPTEMPO LAKERS (311090-103),Nike Roshe Flyknit Men's Voltage Green/Lucid Green/White 77243301,Nike J Crew Killshot 2 Size 11.5 Leather Sneaker NEW No Box 432997-107,Nike Air Wild Mid Men's Golden Beige/Ale Brown/Golden Beige 16819200Men's Nike Air Max 90 Ultra 2.0 SE Athletic Fashion Sneakers 875845 001 WhiteNEW 878636 400 MEN'S NIKE LEBRON XIV LOW SHOE !! MIDNIGHT NAVY/METALLIC GOLD,Nike Airmax 95 Tt Black 9/10 Condition Size 11.5,Nike Vapormax Grey/ Neon Size 9.5,Nike Air Vapormax Grey Dusty Cactus Black Men Running Shoes Sneakers AH9046-011

2016 Nike Garcon Blazer High Comme Des Garcon Nike cdg Black Size 9 Used Supreme 26bc05

Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old
Nike Air Up '14, Retro, Pippen Bulls, Retail 0, Sz 11,

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”