adidas Powerlift.3 Men's Utility Black/Core Black/White BA8019,Adidas Pharrell Williams HU Holi Stan Smith AC7042 yellow halfshoesNew Balance Men's 40v1 Minimus Training Shoe - Choose SZ/Color:Mr/Ms: Have long enjoyed great fameNEW BALANCE US574, “CONCEPTS” - ITEM NUMBER 4131-32,New Balance Men's MW927BR Walking Shoe Brown US Size 9.0 D (Euro 42.1),Shoes New Balance MRL005 - Blue Navy-9½,New Balance x BAIT x G I Joe Snake Eyes Black US size 10,New Balance Men's m940v3 Running Shoes Black 12 D US,adidas D Rose 7 Low VII drose men basketball shoes blue BY4499,Adidas Chinese New Year EQT Support Yeezy CNY Rooster (SIZE 9) BA7777,Adidas ZX Flux Winter Boots 100% Authentic 7, 13,5 US,Adidas Adizero Takumi Ren 3 III Sz:12.5 AF4042 Green Continental Boost RunningBalance Men's MX608v4 Training Shoe, White/Navy, 10.5 D US:Man's/Woman's: Special PurchaseNew Balance ML1550CW White Men Size US 12 New 100% Authentic,New Balance 530 Elite Blue Pinball M530PIB Men's,New Balance Men's Classic 993 Running Shoes GreenBrand New NEW BALANCE M990SB OG Blue/Red MIU UK9.5 US10 DS 574 1500 577 770NEW MEN’S NEW BALANCE "REVLITE" BOOT BROWN/BLUE HRL710CB MEDIUM WIDTH,adidas ClimaCool 1 Men's Dark Blue/Dark Blue/White BA8574adidas Originals Pro Model Men's Shoes Rednit/FTW White/Gold ac7646 (11 D(M) US)adidas CP9083 Mens Throwstar Running Shoe- Choose SZ/Color.,New Adidas Consortium x Footpatrol EQT Equipment Running Cushion sz 11.5 S80568adidas Men's Alphabounce Em M Running Shoe:Man's/Woman's: Modern And Elegant,New Balance Mens MX40v1 Cross Trainer D Blue Yellow White (No Box Lid) Size 7,Zapatos NEW BALANCE Hombre BLU/BIANCO MRL247NW,M1500MGK New Balance 9.5 US MADE IN ENGLAND TEAL MINT BLACK,New Balance Men's Shoes MT620 RN2 SIZE 10 UK,New Balance Scarpe Sneaker Uomo Blu ML574GPF-27Adidas Originals Men's Superstar Sneakers Size 7 to 12 us BZ0216,AJ2998-400 / Men's Nike Air More Money Basketball Shoes,


Researchers talk of ‘biological annihilation’ as study reveals billions of populations of animals have been lost in recent decades

This article is over 1 year old

A “biological annihilation” of wildlife in recent decades means a sixth mass extinction in Earth’s history is under way and is more severe than previously feared, according to research.

Scientists analysed both common and rare species and found billions of regional or local populations have been lost. They blame human overpopulation and overconsumption for the crisis and warn that it threatens the survival of human civilisation, with just a short window of time in which to act.

The study, published in the peer-reviewed journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, eschews the normally sober tone of scientific papers and calls the massive loss of wildlife a “biological annihilation” that represents a “frightening assault on the foundations of human civilisation”.

Prof Gerardo Ceballos, at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, who led the work, said: “The situation has become so bad it would not be ethical not to use strong language.”

Previous studies have shown species are becoming extinct at a significantly faster rate than for millions of years before, but even so extinctions remain relatively rare giving the impression of a gradual loss of biodiversity. The new work instead takes a broader view, assessing many common species which are losing populations all over the world as their ranges shrink, but remain present elsewhere.

The scientists found that a third of the thousands of species losing populations are not currently considered endangered and that up to 50% of all individual animals have been lost in recent decades. Detailed data is available for land mammals, and almost half of these have lost 80% of their range in the last century. The scientists found billions of populations of mammals, birds, reptiles and amphibians have been lost all over the planet, leading them to say a sixth mass extinction has already progressed further than was thought.

The scientists conclude: “The resulting biological annihilation obviously will have serious ecological, economic and social consequences. Humanity will eventually pay a very high price for the decimation of the only assemblage of life that we know of in the universe.”

They say, while action to halt the decline remains possible, the prospects do not look good: “All signs point to ever more powerful assaults on biodiversity in the next two decades, painting a dismal picture of the future of life, including human life.”

Freeman was part of the team that produced a 2014 analysis of 3000 species that indicated that 50% of individual animals have been lost since 1970, which tallies with the new work but was based on different IUCN data. He agreed strong language is needed: “We need people to be aware of the catastrophic declines we are seeing. I do think there is a place for that within the [new] paper, although it’s a fine line to draw.”

Citing human overpopulation as the root cause of environmental problems has long been controversial, and Ehrlich’s 1968 statement that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation in the 1970s did not come to pass, partly due to new high-yielding crops that Ehrlich himself had noted as possible.

Ehrlich has acknowledged “flaws” in The Population Bomb but said it had been successful in its central aim – alerting people to global environmental issues and the the role of human population in them. His message remains blunt today: “Show me a scientist who claims there is no population problem and I’ll show you an idiot.”